SCOPING REVIEW

  • Mainstreaming Global Mental Health: Is there Potential to Embed Psychosocial Wellbeing Impact in all Global Challenges Research?

    We explore if there is potential to embed psychosocial wellbeing impact in global challenges research where the primary aims are not mental-health-related. We are interested in the use of material practices to deliver impact through routine project activities of working with concrete things together. The UKRI gateway-to-research was searched for information on Global Challenges Research Fund grants from 2015 to May 2020. Analysis shows that only 3% of projects self-categorise as engaging with mental health. Thirty-six non-mental-health GCRF grants were purposefully sampled for diversity and each coded independently by two researchers for relevant information. Findings suggest that: 50-70% of non-mental-health GCRF projects already engage implicitly, but non-strategically, with psychosocial wellbeing impact; opportunities for psychosocial wellbeing impact, from most to least frequent are community mobilisation,  community-building, skills development, positive sense of self, positive emotions, and sociocultural identity; presence of material practice from most to least frequent are: (i) interactions between or enactments upon people, (ii) written materials or images, and (iii) objects; when a material practice was present, it was usually considered usable as a focus to enhance psychosocial wellbeing. Our study provides evidence that there are low hanging fruit opportunities to impact psychosocial wellbeing across SDG through routine project activities.

THEORY OF CHANGE

  • How can we Mainstream Mental Health in Research Engaging the Range of Sustainable Development Goals? A Theory of Sector Culture Change

    Mental health is a leading cause of ill-health worldwide and disproportionately affects low and middle income countries. Mental health aligns most directly with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) ‘Good Health and Well-Being’ but, increasingly, is considered relevant across the SDGs. Global challenges funders and researchers are a distinct set of stakeholders who have not yet been invited to consider mainstreaming mental health. This would constitute a significant sector culture change. Hence, we ask: How can we mainstream mental health in research engaging the range of SDGs? We use the UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund as a case study. In a previous scoping review, we purposefully sampled non-mental health focused GCRF grants for diversity from the beginning of the programme in 2015 until May-end 2020 (N = 36). In the present study, the principal investigator of each grant in this sample was invited to interview, with 11 accepting. Snowballing, our networks, and returning to the funding archive secured a further 15 interviews sampled for diversity (Final N = 13 UK researchers and 13 of their overseas collaborators). A thematic analysis of this data organised key information into a trajectory from the challenges of incorporating mental health impact, to how these challenges might be overcome and, finally, to support needs. This analysis was then organised into a Theory of Change designed to promote the mainstreaming of mental health in global challenges research. We outline the implications for global challenges researchers, mental health practitioners, and global challenge research funders.

OUTCOME 3 COMING SOON